Image
Image

In the June edition of our Employment Law & HR update, we have published a selection of news, insights, case studies and more on topics including:
  • An in-depth analysis of the Labour Party's recent manifesto and its potential impact on businesses and employment practices;
  • The significance of proper pool selection in ensuring fair and legally compliant redundancy procedures;
  • A detailed look at the landmark Employment Tribunal case that resulted in a staggering £4.6m compensation award for disability discrimination; and
  • The importance of precise and careful drafting in settlement agreements to avoid potential legal pitfalls and disputes.
If you require further information on anything included in this update or any employment issue you may be facing, please do not hesitate to contact the Employment team on 01332 867 766 or by replying to this email.
Image
INSIGHT
Labour Party's manifesto: Employment law reforms

On 13 June, the Labour Party unveiled its manifesto for the upcoming general election on 04 July, reaffirming its commitment to the 'Plan to Make Work Pay' (MWP) and introducing several significant employment law reforms.

The manifesto outlines a robust set of policies aimed at supporting workers, enhancing their terms and conditions, and ensuring modern workplace protections. Labour also promises to introduce legislation to implement these reforms within its first 100 days in power.

Key proposals include banning exploitative zero-hours contracts, outlawing 'fire and rehire' practices, extending basic employment rights from day one, and moving towards a single status for workers and employees. Employers may need to prepare for substantial changes in policies and practices to comply with these new regulations.
Image
CASE STUDY
Navigating redundancy: The importance of proper pool selection
Valimulla -v- Al-Khair Foundation

Employers must engage in thorough consultation regarding the proposed pool for redundancy, especially when the pool consists of only one individual.

The case

In the case of Valimulla -v- Al-Khair Foundation, the claimant worked as a liaison officer for the North-West of England. Similar roles were held by other employees in different geographic areas. The need for liaison officers decreased nationwide during the pandemic.
 
The respondent placed the claimant at risk of redundancy in a pool of one, while the other liaison officers were not affected. Although three consultation meetings were held, there was no discussion about whether the pool selection was appropriate. The claimant was dismissed and subsequently claimed unfair dismissal.
 
The outcome
 
The Employment Tribunal (ET) initially ruled that the claimant's dismissal for redundancy was fair, accepting the respondent’s argument that the claimant was in a self-selecting pool of one. The ET found that the overall process was not flawed enough to be considered unfair.
 
However, the claimant appealed this decision. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) allowed the appeal, determining that the redundancy consultation needed to occur at a stage where it could make a difference. The respondent had failed to consult with the claimant about the selection pool. Additionally, the ET had not adequately assessed whether choosing a pool of one was reasonable in this situation.
 
As a result, the EAT substituted the original ruling with a finding of unfair dismissal on procedural grounds, specifically due to the lack of consultation regarding the redundancy pool.
 
Key takeaways for employers
  1. Consultation on pooling is crucial: Employers must consult with employees about the proposed pool for redundancy. This consultation should occur at a time when it can influence the decision-making process.
  2. Reasonableness of pool selection: Employers should carefully consider and justify the reasonableness of selecting a pool of one. This decision should be documented and communicated during consultations.
  3. Documentation & communication: Ensure all decisions and justifications regarding the redundancy pool are well documented. Clear communication with employees about these decisions is essential to avoid claims of unfair dismissal.
  4. Consultation process: The consultation process should be thorough and inclusive. Employees should have the opportunity to discuss and challenge the proposed redundancy pool.
  5. Procedural fairness: Procedural fairness is key. Failure to consult appropriately about the redundancy pool can lead to findings of unfair dismissal, even if the redundancy itself is substantively justified.
By following these points, employers can better navigate the redundancy process and reduce the risk of successful unfair dismissal claims.
 
Image
CASE STUDY
Headline grabbing £4.6m compensation award for disability discrimination
Wright-Turner -v- London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham and another

This landmark Employment Tribunal case for disability discrimination reveals critical missteps by the employer, resulting in an award covering loss of earnings, injury to feelings, and more.

Our case study delves into the details, providing practical guidance for employers on managing disability in the workplace and adhering to fair procedures.

Image
CASE STUDY
Settlement Agreements & Future Claims
Clifford -v- IBM United Kingdom Ltd

In June 2024, the Employment Appeal Tribunal ruled that a settlement agreement signed in 2012 could prevent an employee from bringing a discrimination claim a decade later.

Mr. Clifford's case against IBM, based on missed salary reviews, was dismissed due to a comprehensive waiver in his 2013 agreement. 

This decision underscores the importance of precise drafting in settlement agreements and the need for employees to fully understand the long-term implications of their waivers.

Contact our employment law experts
_____
 
 
© Flint Bishop LLP

The content of this email is provided for general interest and information. It contains only a brief overview of aspects of the subject matter and is not intended to provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and is not intended to provide a substitute for it. Your information will be processed in accordance with our privacy notice. Flint Bishop LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership, registered in England and Wales. Our registration number is OC317931. Its registered office is Pinnacle Building, 2 Prospect Place, Pride Park, Derby DE24 8HG. We are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA ID 509657). A list of members’ names is available for inspection at our registered office. Any reference to a Partner of Flint Bishop LLP means a member or an employee with equivalent standing and qualifications. Flint Bishop Solicitors and FBDebt are trading names of Flint Bishop LLP. 
 
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
View in your browser  |  Subscription Preferences  |   Unsubscribe